VBAC – Vaginal birth after caesarean

Or trial of labour after caesarean

You have a choice about the mode of birth after a previous caesarean. In order to make the right choices for yourself you need accurate, current and evidence based information.

Below is a summary of current research and guidelines about VBAC.
  • VBAC is or should be successful 75% of the time
  • While uterine rupture is a real concern for VBAC it is a rare occurrence. (Guise, 2010) There is a 0.64% – 1.2% of a uterine rupture after 1 previous lower transverse caesarean scar in a spontaneous labour, without induction nor augmentation, (that equates to 0.64-1.2 per 100 women). (Landon, 2004; Verhoeven, 2009; Zwart 2009).
  • The risk of an unscarred uterus rupturing is 0.0049% (that’s 4.9 per 10,000 women) in spontaneous labour as compared to 0.64 -1.2% in a scarred uterus. (Verhoeven, 2009).
  • In an unscarred women uterine rupture rate with induction of labour (IOL) is 0.022% an increase of 44.89% risk of rupture vs spontaneous labour. (Zwart, 2009)
  • The risks associated with caesareans increase with each caesarean eg. PPH, future placenta praevia and placenta accrete, ICU admissions, hysterectomy, blood transfusions, bladder injuries, thromboembolism & DVT for the mother as well as uterine rupture. (Landon, 2004). All these risks reduce after a successful VBAC (Mercer, 2008)
  • The risk of maternal death is very low in both VBAC and repeat caesareans 0.02% for VBAC vs. 0.04% for repeat caesarean (Landon, 2004)
  • Only major/complete/true uterine ruptures are life threatening to mother and baby.
  • A complete true/full or major uterine rupture is a “tear” in the uterus that is full the full thickness of the uterus. It is life threatening to both mother and baby.
  • Uterine dehiscence (incomplete rupture or a window in the uterus) is not a separation of the full thickness of the uterus. It is not life threatening and often is asymptomatic. It is important when looking at statistics to exclude dehiscence from uterine rupture statistics. The rate of true rupture and of dehiscence is the same (Landon, 2004)
  • A true uterine rupture is life threatening to baby and the rate for foetal deaths is 6.2% of uterine ruptures (Guise, 2010). This means 6.2% of 0.64% In other words 0.04 per 100 or 4 in 10,000 babies.
  • Although extremely rare uterine rupture after a caesarean can happen without labour.
  • Caesarean section creates the risk of uterine rupture
  • “While rare for both VBAC and ERCD [elective repeat cesarean delivery], maternal mortality was significantly increased for ERCD at 13.4 per 100,000 versus 3.8 per 100,000 for TOL. The rates of maternal hysterectomy, hemorrhage, and transfusions did not differ significantly between TOL and ERCD. The rate of uterine rupture for all women with prior cesarean is 3 per 1,000 and the risk was significantly increased with TOL (4.7 1,000 versus 0.3 1,000 ERCD). Six percent of uterine ruptures were associated with perinatal death. Perinatal mortality was significantly increased for TOL at 1.3 per 1,000 versus 0.5 per 1,000 for ERCD… VBAC is a reasonable and safe choice for the majority of women with prior cesarean. Moreover, there is emerging evidence of serious harms relating to multiple cesareans… The occurrence of maternal and infant mortality for women with prior cesarean is not significantly elevated when compared with national rates overall of mortality in childbirth. The majority of women who have TOL will have a VBAC, and they and their infants will be healthy. However, there is a minority of women who will suffer serious adverse consequences of both TOL and ERCD. While TOL rates have decreased over the last decade, VBAC rates and adverse outcomes have not changed suggesting that the reduction is not reflecting improved patient selection.” (Guise, 2010).


  • Guise, J-M., Eden, K., Emeis, C. Denman, M. Marshall, N., Fu, R., Janik, R., Nygren, P., Walker, M., McDonagh, M.(2010). Evidence Report/Technology AssessmentNumber 191 Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights. Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science Universit. Portland, Oregon
  • Landon, M., Hauth, J., Leveno, K. (2004). Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery. The New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 2581-2589.
  • Landon, M. B., Leindecker, S., Spong, C., Hauth, J., Bloom, S., Varner, M., et al. (2005). The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193, 1016-1023.
  • Landon, M., Spong, C., Tom, E. (2006). Risk of Uterine Rupture With a Trial of Labor in Women with Multiple and Single Prior Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 108, 12-20.
  • Mercer, B., Gilbert, S., Landon, M., Spong, C. (2008). Labor Outcomes With Increasing Number of Prior Vaginal Births After Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 11, 285-91.
  • National Institutes of Health. (2010, June). Final Statement. Retrieved from NIH Consensus Development Conference on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights:
  • Verhhoeven, C., Ondenaarden, A., Hermus, M., Porath, M., Oei, S., Mol, B. (2009). Validation of models that predict caesarean section after induction of labour. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 34, 316-321
  • Zwart, J., Richters,J., Ory, F., deVries, J., Bloemenkamp, K., van Roosmalen, J. (2009) Uterine rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116 (8). 1069-1080

Get in touch

Every birth is a unique and personal experience. We will work with you to develop a birth plan that meets your needs. Providing you with the information to feel prepared and ready for your most amazing journey.